Jim,
I am certain you have been on flights of ultra low fare carriers that put a priority on onboard sales and they do that by motivating their crews by tying individual sales performance to their paycheck.
Nothing more motivating than to know that the more you as an individual sell, the more you personally gain.
Onboard mobile technology allows that and airlines should use it to that end.
E,
It's not I who says AA is losing money on its Pacific network.... AA itself tells the DOT who shares the info because that is what people want to know. Mr. Merkel would be a lot less ticked if she knew some of the info the US gov has on her citizens right? Same principle works w/ the airlines.
AA says they lost 14 cents for every dollar of revenue on the Pacific. Their revenue on LAX-PVG and NRT routes are well below even their ORD routes.
The only salvation for AA on LAX-Asia is that UA might be ready to seriously start throwing in the towel on some parts of its network in order in order push its financial performance to levels that WS expects. Of course if UA throws in the towel on LAX-Asia, it isn't a stretch that DL might expand its LAX-Asia network. History would say that UA has been an easier competitor to AA than DL.
It isn't a big secret what kind of passenger or cargo loads airlines carry to their employees who have access to operational data, which crew members do. Pilots and FAs and ground staff obviously know what is revenue pax and cargo and how much of each goes on each flight, even if they have to swap info with each other to get the picture. The nice DOT summarizes it all for the public as well.
Full planes don't mean profits, esp. since published gov't airfares show how deeply AA is willing to discount its int'l routes in order to fill seats. Many of AA's int'l gov't contract fares for this year are far lower than the average fare published by the DOT for all carriers which shows how badly AA has to push to fill some flights and how much market share is a strategy for AA in some markets.