A330 Pitot Tubes

jcw

Veteran
Aug 12, 2004
2,053
2,683
Does anyone know if US has replaced the instruments (pitot tubes) per Airbus recommendations?
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #3
It's not media speculation. Airbus recommended replacing them and was wondering if we replaced them.
 
How many Pitot tubes are there?

Chances of all of them icing up and giving false readings?
Would think the unit that reads the data more likely an issue then the source of the data.
 
How many Pitot tubes are there?

Chances of all of them icing up and giving false readings?
Would think the unit that reads the data more likely an issue then the source of the data.
Are you second-guessing the engineers at Airbus? Perhaps that attitude is why mx at US has become so pathetic, in almost every respect.

I would likely never take an aircraft "repaired" in PHX. Really bad. and, not the individual mechanics fault. Just really crappy management. At best.
 
How many Pitot tubes are there?

Chances of all of them icing up and giving false readings?
Would think the unit that reads the data more likely an issue then the source of the data.

There was an issue at one time having to do with the heating elements in the pitots if memory serves. I was on the 320 then. It's been a while since I heard anything about it.

A320 Driver B)
 
There was an issue at one time having to do with the heating elements in the pitots if memory serves. I was on the 320 then. It's been a while since I heard anything about it.

A320 Driver B)

They are going to begin replacing them as soon as they're done with the modification of the 757 right recirc fans. Look for updated pitot tubes some time around 2045. (And that's not 8:45 pm!)

Unless the FAA mandates immediate action through an emergency Airworthiness Directive, the company will play this out to it's calendar extreme.
 
They are going to begin replacing them as soon as they're done with the modification of the 757 right recirc fans. Look for updated pitot tubes some time around 2045. (And that's not 8:45 pm!)

Unless the FAA mandates immediate action through an emergency Airworthiness Directive, the company will play this out to it's calendar extreme.


All kidding aside, I think they are done. I'll find out.

A320 Driver B)
 
The BEA announced on June 5th, that so far only these facts have been verified:

- location near the planned route over the Atlantic in the vicinity of significant convective cells characteristic for the equatorial region
- from start of the automatic message transmissions the reported measured speeds were inconsistent.

Airbus Industries reminded all operators of Airbus Aircraft series A300 to A380 of the operational, abnormal and emergency procedures in the relevant Flight Crew Operation Manuals and Quick Reference Manuals regarding flying with unreliable airspeed.

More details of the ACARS messages have become available on June 5th and suggest following events while the airplane was in cruise (note, there is no message regarding electrics, hydraulics or engine problems):


02:10Z:
Autothrust off


Autopilot off


FBW alternate law


Rudder Travel Limiter Fault


TCAS fault due to antenna fault


Flight Envelope Computation warning


All pitot static ports lost

02:11Z:
Failure of all three ADIRUs


Failure of gyros of ISIS (attitude information lost)

02:12Z:
ADIRUs Air Data disagree

02:13Z:
Flight Management, Guidance and Envelope Computer fault


PRIM 1 fault


SEC 1 fault

02:14Z:
Cabin Pressure Controller fault (cabin vertical speed)



** anyone who has Airbus knowledge can see just how bad things were **
 
Realistically just from a PR perspective, it would make sense that a press release roll out of Tempe, indicating what has been done or will be done.

Lately, on the updates of AF447 on the network news there is always mention at the end that the operators of the A330 in the US are US Airways and DL/NW.
 
The BEA announced on June 5th, that so far only these facts have been verified:

- location near the planned route over the Atlantic in the vicinity of significant convective cells characteristic for the equatorial region
- from start of the automatic message transmissions the reported measured speeds were inconsistent.

Airbus Industries reminded all operators of Airbus Aircraft series A300 to A380 of the operational, abnormal and emergency procedures in the relevant Flight Crew Operation Manuals and Quick Reference Manuals regarding flying with unreliable airspeed.

More details of the ACARS messages have become available on June 5th and suggest following events while the airplane was in cruise (note, there is no message regarding electrics, hydraulics or engine problems):


02:10Z:
Autothrust off


Autopilot off


FBW alternate law


Rudder Travel Limiter Fault


TCAS fault due to antenna fault


Flight Envelope Computation warning


All pitot static ports lost

02:11Z:
Failure of all three ADIRUs


Failure of gyros of ISIS (attitude information lost)

02:12Z:
ADIRUs Air Data disagree

02:13Z:
Flight Management, Guidance and Envelope Computer fault


PRIM 1 fault


SEC 1 fault

02:14Z:
Cabin Pressure Controller fault (cabin vertical speed)



** anyone who has Airbus knowledge can see just how bad things were **

Looks as if someone threw a switch and turned the cockpit OFF.

No instruments, in the dark, with degraded flight controls. Really doesn't matter what kind of airplane your in if this happens.

A320 Driver :(
 
02:10Z:
Autothrust off


Autopilot off


FBW alternate law


Rudder Travel Limiter Fault


TCAS fault due to antenna fault


Flight Envelope Computation warning


All pitot static ports lost

02:11Z:
Failure of all three ADIRUs


Failure of gyros of ISIS (attitude information lost)

02:12Z:
ADIRUs Air Data disagree

02:13Z:
Flight Management, Guidance and Envelope Computer fault


PRIM 1 fault


SEC 1 fault

02:14Z:
Cabin Pressure Controller fault (cabin vertical speed)



** anyone who has Airbus knowledge can see just how bad things were **

OMG!
 
Faults are listed that you could not possibly see in any scenario other than a fire in the E/E compartment or a massive electrical short... or an explosion.
 
Explosion, maybe. But I think the other two scenarios would have triggered a report of an overheated E/E compartment before any subsequent cascade of failures.

I had read that the same Air France flight had been the subject of a bomb scare five weeks earlier. The only reason I mention that is the fact that this aircraft was lost outside of the range of any radar and any VHF communication. **If** a flight were to be so targeted then the timing would be optimal when it is so located.

It won't make any difference to the victims what the cause was, but for the rest of us I hope that it can be attributed to weather or some other mechanical fault. Heck, even pilot error would be a preferable cause compared to a bombing.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top