topDawg
Veteran
- Nov 23, 2010
- 2,957
- 2,298
eh I think it might be for the best that AA changed it but I also don't think it is that big of a deal. At some point we have to draw a line. AA should never use Flight 11 or Flight 77 again. they also shouldn't use the ship and tail numbers of the two airplanes (same thing goes for United)....but I think that the line gets draw there.phlgreaser said:Are you kidding me?
Who picked this tail number?
Post your thoughts.
Me................... WOW!
also posted on usairways forum
Glenn Quagmire said:NWA had N666US... A 747-400. It may still be flying under the Delta logo.
They do. Delta also has a ship 911 that is an MD88.
which I think is the right thing to do.eolesen said:I think I would have skipped that registry number. LAA purposely didn't re-use flight numbers or N numbers that were involved in crashes
I am not sure that a N number with 911 is in the same ball park though.
I don't think we had a ship 666. I think they skipped it but I could be wrong.Kev3188 said:I can't remember for certain if it is or not. Also fairly sure there's a '57 with a 666 no. as well?
Have to check out the fleet list when I get back to work...