safety stud
Senior
- Apr 6, 2006
- 417
- 15
We have all had to come to grips with the arbitrators ruling. As many of you have read all the postings, the line has been drawn. It's now East Pilots vs West Pilots... with the rest of the labor groups in the middle.
It must be apparent to all reading the posts, there will be a harsh response from the east. Whether U can survive this will remain to be seen. I've heard pilots say they would rather bring the company down than have to deal with the arbitrators ruling. As to the ruling itself. It's implemintation is based on a merged contract with both sides (U/AWA). That said...
East would never vote on a contract to merge both parties.
Where does that leave the airline?
1. Without a merged contract from the pilot group there will be no capability of operating under one certificate.
2. Without said certificate, synergy, as DP puts it can't be realized. Ergo loss of fincancial stability with our creditors.
3. Without said creditors, implemintation of future aircraft purchases would be curtailed or lossed.
4. Loss of said aircraft means less capacity. Capacity of which has been brought down to unheard of levels. Even at the worst of times.
5. Loss of said capacity means loss of revenue.
6. Loss of revenue means I may no longer get a paycheck...
7. Loss of my paycheck... Means....
8. Now you have ME to deal with...
True, airplanes don't fly without pilots. But they can't fly without flight attendants either. Neither can a Captain pull off the gate without a A/C maintenence logbook. And how about the reservationist who might book a 757 to 500 people... or maybe a ramper who fill an a/c with LAX bags when it's going to BOS.
Yea, I can see the steam rising above the heads of everyone effected.
East vs. West...
Hadfields vs. McCoys...
Crossin the Mason Dixon line...
NEVER, and I mean NEVER, do you mess with another persons paycheck...
Just my opinion...
It must be apparent to all reading the posts, there will be a harsh response from the east. Whether U can survive this will remain to be seen. I've heard pilots say they would rather bring the company down than have to deal with the arbitrators ruling. As to the ruling itself. It's implemintation is based on a merged contract with both sides (U/AWA). That said...
East would never vote on a contract to merge both parties.
Where does that leave the airline?
1. Without a merged contract from the pilot group there will be no capability of operating under one certificate.
2. Without said certificate, synergy, as DP puts it can't be realized. Ergo loss of fincancial stability with our creditors.
3. Without said creditors, implemintation of future aircraft purchases would be curtailed or lossed.
4. Loss of said aircraft means less capacity. Capacity of which has been brought down to unheard of levels. Even at the worst of times.
5. Loss of said capacity means loss of revenue.
6. Loss of revenue means I may no longer get a paycheck...
7. Loss of my paycheck... Means....
8. Now you have ME to deal with...
True, airplanes don't fly without pilots. But they can't fly without flight attendants either. Neither can a Captain pull off the gate without a A/C maintenence logbook. And how about the reservationist who might book a 757 to 500 people... or maybe a ramper who fill an a/c with LAX bags when it's going to BOS.
Yea, I can see the steam rising above the heads of everyone effected.
East vs. West...
Hadfields vs. McCoys...
Crossin the Mason Dixon line...
NEVER, and I mean NEVER, do you mess with another persons paycheck...
Just my opinion...