Should Drippy Quill Be Banned Fron The Board?

[The Dissident]

Should Drippy Quill be banned from the boad for his childish posts. You make the call...

 

[SilentWarrior]

Why is this post even here? What does it have to do with AA or airlines in general?

I am certain that Drippy Quill's post are no more "childish" than some posted on these boards. Some threads get to the "Jerry Springer" level of conversation. (I paricularly like the "I'm going on strike" or "I am organizing a Sick-out" threads)

I am positive that if the Moderator's did not approve of Drippy Quill's post he would be gone by now.

 

[Dr. Freud]

Should Herr Drippy be banned?
I say NEIN!
Drippy does vonders for my research on ze mind (?) of ze average TWU dunkof!
Please continue mein Drippy!

 

[RV4]

Drippy is our best AMFA Organizer to date.

I say let him stay and show the intellgence of TWU advocates.

 

[Raptor]

I say give him the boot unless of course he wants to start acting like an adult.

 

[redheadedstepbatard]

Freedom of speech says he has a right to be here, and just like the media yoy don't like what you hear TURN IT OFF!

 

[TonyB]

Freedom of speech is not guaranteed in the private sector. It is only a right from government infringement.
However I say LET THE DRIP STAY!
He is one of the TWU's best and brightest. He's great for the AMFA drive!

 

[The Dissident]

Freedom of speech says he has a right to be here, and just like the media yoy don't like what you hear TURN IT OFF!

Sounds like Dippy in disguise to me!!!!

 

[Torrent Star]

From what I have seen of the posts on these boards anything goes, he is no better or worse than the rest. Let him stay

 

[Boomer]

Banning unpopular speech has been as productive as legislating morality.

Whoopy Cushion has not yet risen to the censored standard of having cried "fire" in a crowded theatre. While his posts may be reactionary, and to some offensive, that is the price paid to live in a free Republic and to participate as Agents of Change.

A Voice raised in rebellion has no right to dictate only echoes.

 

[The Dissident]

I whish to thank you all for unwittingly taking part in my little experiment. It seems that a majority of amfa supporters that posted on this thread said let him speak even though they didnt agree with Dippy. Did you notice there was no cio or twuer coming to the defense of Dippy. No steve either,or for that matter almost none of the hardcore twu lackeys came to the defense of Dippy. Kinda makes you wonder what they will do to defend their membership when the crap hits the fan. Oh yeah I forgot we already found that out did'nt we..

 

[Checking it Out]

It is interesting dissident about your comments, You are attempting to deceive the audience by claiming you are in support of freedom of speech. Go to air-mechanic and the-mechanic and see who gets censored the majority of the time!

Amfa wantabes censors a great deal and now is begging for TWU supporters to engage so you can tear them down. This is what you do best! Go look at the issues and you will see amfa makes it more personal than any other group.

Keep up the Great Job all YOU TWU BROTHERS AND SISTERS!!

 

[Boomer]

I respect the right to "dissent" from the mainline point of view.

Given:
More than 50+1% of the Maintenance & Related have signed cards to decertify the TWU and certify AMFA as their Representational Agent.

Question:
In that you have always cited the will of the majority, citing the recent concession agreement, will you now champion the cause of the majority in promoting AMFA as the representational Union?

I know that you have questioned the whole Whoopy Cushion, DQ, posting thing...but given that you posted some 7 times between the time the thread was posed and when you finished responding to other threads; it is not unreasonable that you would have had ample opportunity to defend a likeminded compatriot versus the supposition that there was no defense of the position and so you elected to lay in wait for someone to committ an error upon which you could pounce.

Que' es tu' raison detre?

 

[Rusty]

It is interesting dissident about your comments, You are attempting to deceive the audience by claiming you are in support of freedom of speech. Go to air-mechanic and the-mechanic and see who gets censored the majority of the time!

Amfa wantabes censors a great deal and now is begging for TWU supporters to engage so you can tear them down. This is what you do best! Go look at the issues and you will see amfa makes it more personal than any other group.

Keep up the Great Job all YOU TWU BROTHERS AND SISTERS!!

CIO, I agree those are great sites to visit, as both believe in democracy. So far the only things I have seen edited or deleted are foul mouthed stuff that serves no purpose. Here at USaviation I fell into the same trap of cussing and was out of line, a moderator appropriately edited my post. These are very good sites to see what the rest of the industry believes about AMFA. Thanks for bringing that up CIO.


As far as: "Go look at the issues and you will see amfa makes it more personal than any other group."

I would have to agree on your point here CIO. I do think AMFA supporters take wages, benefits, work rules and union affiliation more personal and, I believe everyone should.

 

[The Dissident]

It is interesting dissident about your comments, You are attempting to deceive the audience by claiming you are in support of freedom of speech. Go to air-mechanic and the-mechanic and see who gets censored the majority of the time!

Amfa wantabes censors a great deal and now is begging for TWU supporters to engage so you can tear them down. This is what you do best! Go look at the issues and you will see amfa makes it more personal than any other group.

Keep up the Great Job all YOU TWU BROTHERS AND SISTERS!!

So cio why did'nt you come to the defense of dippy? Since when is asking a question put me in the same league as wanting to ban free speech. Im sure if one of the AMFA supporters were posting like dippy you would run and cry to the moderator. By the way this is a privately controlled website therefore free speech does not exist here. What type of speech does exist is what the owners of the web site want to allow. Free speech which you claim to adamantly adhere to only protects the citizenery from goverment reprisal when speaking out against it. I have also noticed that you and the other twu lackeys only claim free speech when it is convient to do so and all you care about is the freedom of your speech and not the opositions. There was no deception involved in opening this thread. Face it you are only distraught because some of your true nature was exposed and the oposition came to the defense of one of your own.