Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hmmm...taking the company private. Sorry, but I haven't seen where very many companies that were taken private was very good for the employees. Especially in a market where folks want the cookie, but don't want to pay any more than it would cost to fly Airtran or Southwest. I wonder how much in concessions that TPG will require from employees to maintain the cookie, but get their CASMS to drop at least 2 cents. I wonder what impact it will have when the Midwest fleet is reconfigured to 2 + 3 seating with a couple of extra rows. Bottom line....for the customers who didn't want to see Midwest become Airtran, they are going to see Midwest become....well...Airtran.Congrats to Midwest, job well done.
I just can't help but wonder how satisfied those whose mantra was "anyone but AirTran" are going to be when we find out who "anyone" is and what "anyone" decides to do with Midwest as a condition of their investment.
Reminds me of the mid-80s when a similar "anyone but Lorenzo/Texas Air Group" mantra was rampant at TWA and they ended up in the clutches of...Carl Ichan!!
Be careful what you wish for... :blink:
Hmmm...taking the company private. Sorry, but I haven't seen where very many companies that were taken private was very good for the employees. Especially in a market where folks want the cookie, but don't want to pay any more than it would cost to fly Airtran or Southwest. I wonder how much in concessions that TPG will require from employees to maintain the cookie, but get their CASMS to drop at least 2 cents. I wonder what impact it will have when the Midwest fleet is reconfigured to 2 + 3 seating with a couple of extra rows. Bottom line....for the customers who didn't want to see Midwest become Airtran, they are going to see Midwest become....well...Airtran.
Personally, I think this will actually benefit Airtran in the long run. And reading that NWA was a part of the group - I wonder how long before the new "private owners" will take their profits and fold Midwest into NWA.
And if Airtran moved into MKE - it would put tremendous pressure on Midwest to change - which would eliminate their "niche" of wide seats and fresh cookies. Midwest cannot offer "premium" service while charging the same fares as a low cost carrier. Not when their costs are as high as they are. Midwest has a minihub here in KC - it's great to get two abreast seating and fresh cookies - but to compete, Midwest is actually charging LESS than Airtran on both advance purchase and walkup tickets for many routes. On routes where they DO charge a premium - it's about $5. That cannot support what they do. Airtran moving into MKE on their own would throw a monkey wrench into the works.None of all this could stop AirTran from moving into Milwaukee anyway. MKE just opened about 10 new gates, so gate space is not a problem.
I agree. I posted earlier that I thought the offer after offer after offer deal was a ploy to acquire Midwest on the cheap. When all offers are rebuffed, you move in. If anyone complains, you're able to say, "Hey, we tried to do it the nice way (creating more jobs, etc.), but they turned us down." Judging from an article in the AJC today that quoted our COO as saying we will scale down future growth and only add flights between existing cities, who knows what will happen? A few years ago, I was in a recurrent training class, and the COO came in and said in response to a question about new cities, "We will not be adding any new cities this year." A week later, we announced new service to IND and CLT. It made me wonder if the Vice-president of catering is in charge of our route structure.None of all this could stop AirTran from moving into Milwaukee anyway. MKE just opened about 10 new gates, so gate space is not a problem.
Thats funny. At USAirways the Circus CLOWNS are running the ENTIRE Operation. (Hopefully Midwest will accept the deal.......it looks like a good merger on paper).I agree. I posted earlier that I thought the offer after offer after offer deal was a ploy to acquire Midwest on the cheap. When all offers are rebuffed, you move in. If anyone complains, you're able to say, "Hey, we tried to do it the nice way (creating more jobs, etc.), but they turned us down." Judging from an article in the AJC today that quoted our COO as saying we will scale down future growth and only add flights between existing cities, who knows what will happen? A few years ago, I was in a recurrent training class, and the COO came in and said in response to a question about new cities, "We will not be adding any new cities this year." A week later, we announced new service to IND and CLT. It made me wonder if the Vice-president of catering is in charge of our route structure.
.... and it just got more interesting.... FL raised the bid about 30 minutes ago. Check it out on the next Thread....Thats funny. At USAirways the Circus CLOWNS are running the ENTIRE Operation. (Hopefully Midwest will accept the deal.......it looks like a good merger on paper).