Heroes Who Pass Out Snacks

Light Years

Veteran
Aug 27, 2002
2,878
0
Source: Los Angeles Times
Author: Meghan Daum
August 6, 2005


TO ANYONE WHO'S ever smirked, snapped, whined, yelled or (you know who you are) thrown things at a flight attendant, let's consider this: Last Tuesday, the cabin crew of Air France Flight 358 evacuated all 297 passengers after a crash landing in Toronto. They did this in less than two minutes. Moments later, the plane burst into flames.

I know what you're thinking: "If they can get 300 people off in under two minutes, why does it take 45 minutes to board a plane?" As in all things air travel-related, the lame jokes abound. ("I tried to jump down the slide, but they stopped me because the seat-belt sign was on!")
But maybe seeing 10 flight attendants save about 300 lives in less time than it took to watch the safety demonstration will put an end to the jokes. It's been a long time coming. Somehow, passengers have been lulled into thinking that flight attendants are there primarily to serve as waiters and arbiters of luggage space. But accidents have a way of reducing inconveniences like pillow shortages and paltry snacks to shamefully petty concerns.

Several years ago, while researching a magazine article about the "secret world of flight attendants," I spent a week at the flight attendant training school of a major airline. Granted, this was three years before 9/11, back when the combination of dreary mundanity and diminishing leg room had left people with about as much respect for air travel as they had for pre-owned Yugos. "Air rage" was the coinage of the day, and incidents of violence against airline personnel had risen dramatically.

I visited the school because I was a smug young journalist working for a smug glossy magazine and I was hoping for some salacious details about a profession that had fascinated the public since the early days of commercial flight. Since airline industry deregulation in 1978, the archetypal sex-kitten stewardess made famous by books such as the 1960s-era "Coffee, Tea or Me" had devolved into a haggard assortment of short-tempered corporate drones. The heyday of air travel, when flight attendants were required to be female, slim, unmarried and possessed of the uncanny ability to cook eggs to order during turbulence, was long gone.

But my assignment was doomed. The courses I observed had less to do with applying makeup and charming businessmen than with something far less sensational: safety.

The drills went on and on and on. We practiced verbal instructions until we could recite them like Beatles lyrics. We rehearsed procedures until every exit door and window, every inflatable slide and alarm bell felt as familiar as the dashboard controls on a car we'd owned for a decade.

I can still remember the sensation of opening the hatch of the exit window in the cabin simulator. I can still hear the siren and the exact wording of the evacuation commands for the slides. "Keep your feet together, jump into the slide," the students yelled until they were hoarse. I watched as they learned how to inflate rafts. I ran around the simulator with them as they enacted crash after crash, knowing full well that no matter how intensive the training, nothing but focus and sheer guts would see them through the real thing.

Among the other things I learned about flight attendants was that their starting salaries could be as low as $15,000 a year. They regularly have to work 14-hour days but are often paid for only eight hours. Most have to buy their own uniforms for hundreds of dollars. That means they often have only one, which they have to wash out in hotel sinks.

Air France rightfully praised the crew of Flight 358 for its professionalism. But it's the flying public that needs to recognize such contributions. Airline deregulation, which slashed prices along with amenities, legroom and salaries, caused many of us to forget our manners. Then Sept. 11 introduced a narrative that suggested the fates of airliners lay in the hands of passengers, whether terrorists or heroes.

But, as we learned on Tuesday, accidents still occur and we still rely on those who are trained to protect us from potentially tragic outcomes. On airplanes, it so happens that these are the same people who pass out the inedible food and tell us when our bags won't fit overhead. But we've seen they can do a lot more than that. Let's be polite.
 
PineyBob said:
99.99% of the time that nice lady or gentleman who brings you your cocktail or soft drink is notihng more than glorified wait staff.

SKY HIGH states: wait staff?......Such ignorance. Flight attendants are trained in stroke, heart attack, bleeding, burns, evacuations, decompressions, bombs, terrorism, child birth, ditching, diabetes, CPR, Defibrillators, emergency equipment, broken bones, asthma, choking, unconsiciousness, firearms, prisoners.............and the list goes on.
What's the ratio?.......I believe One in Six flight attendants will prepare the cabin for an EMERGENCY LANDING in their career. This carrier will have several cabin preps PER YEAR. The defibrillator at U has already saved lives. (operated by a FLIGHT ATTENDANT). And lets not forget the numerous inflight medical emergencies that occur weekly.
Flight attendants do NOT have to evacuate an aircraft to convey the SAFETY PROFESSIONALS that they are. :up:

now, lets get back to more IMPORTANT issues, like the long term success of this company! :up:
 
I saw this article a few days ago someplace else. It's a very good tribute to those of you who serve us in the skies... and a good reminder that serving food/drinks is NOT the main reason you are there.

I've personally had an experience a few years ago where I was on a redeye from LAS that had a engine go out. The crew that night did an excellent job reassuring us that the plane could fly with one engine, and we ended up landing at DEN without incident.

Thank you all for being heroes every day... even though most of us do not say it. :)
 
give_a_damn_progress5795.gif
 
That's the kind of attitude around here that needs to be thrown out the door! :down: Bye Bye Now!
 
Whatnow? said:
That's the kind of attitude around here that needs to be thrown out the door! :down: Bye Bye Now!
[post="289253"][/post]​

I've documented this already on these boards... as a professor in academia, I feel for all of you non-mgmt folks at US. I think our administration at the university must have been the professors for mgmt at CCY. We are micromanaged like you all are, we've made "sacrifices" for the cause like you all have... the only difference is we don't have the union to voice for us (and that may be changing, even though I have many mixed emotions about that).

Today is our first day back for the fall semester where we have meetings (i.e. sessions where we are fed total BS), and our morale is at the same level as folks at US have. We love the students, but it's the management we could do without. I think the frontliners can relate. usair_begins_with_u's humorous graphics hits things on the head. However, I think we are all professional enough to not let the students (customers) see that, even though outside the classroom they know we are not happy about the way we are treated, just as many of you have told several of our FFOCUS members how unhappy you are with CCY's treatment. For example, when the college president and academic dean get +/- $10K raises per year, and we get maybe 3% (say $1K). Doesn't that sound like the games CCY plays? The difference is because we are a state-supported institution, salaries are public information... so we know what our "management" is making. That's not necessarily the case for US. When the Dean is driving a beamer and the faculty drive 10 year old vehicles something is wrong.

In short, I feel your pain... and because of that I appreciate what each and every one of you have done for me the last 20 years. Thank you again for the hard work and dedication you've shown me in the air. :up:

I hope the "attitude" Whatsnow? refers too improves once Tempe takes over. My guess is that it will be a total turnaround.
 
The article is good, but I would stop short of calling flight attendants "heroes".
 
PineyBob said:
Did ya bother to read the rest of the post ya nitwit. The point of why F/A's aren't percieved differently is because the incidents you refer to don't happen a heck of alot. That's the whole point of both the article and my post.

Sky High states: Nitwit?........Time for a "flush", Piney?
I'm FAMILIAR with F/A articles that usually mention an evacuation, how F/A's performed in emergencies. I KNOW HOW WE ARE PERCIEVED--->I have 26 YEARS SENIORITY! Management in the 60's and 70's "shaped" that public perception.
AFA has a long history of changing that perception through lobbying Congress and legislation. And, in contract negotiations!
I posted a response to EXPAND ON THE ARTICLE, MENTIONING "SITUATIONS" THAT USUALLY NEVER MAKE THE NEWS.

Apparently, YOU didnt get MY POINT either............ :down:
 
JS said:
The article is good, but I would stop short of calling flight attendants "heroes".
[post="289399"][/post]​

Sky high states: And why is that?....A fire fighter goes into a burning HOUSE and makes the local newspaper-------> Fire fighter HERO saves lives.
Those FLIGHT ATTENDANTS saved lives, it's heroic that they got 300 people off an aircraft that CRASHED and caught fire. :up: :up: :up:
 
PineyBob said:
OK Then what do you call them?


THANK YOU, BOB :up:

I, too, think its AMAZING "Everyone" got out, ALIVE!

Some people would think, its Amazing "ANYONE" got out, Alive!
 

Latest posts

Back
Top