Good News For Aa

Kelly is welcoming someone else to do his work for him. Once somebody makes one change to it, it will become difficult for the government to say no to any other changes, let alone a complete abolishment. This is kind of the same mindset that gay marriage has. Once you allow one exception, you have allow the rest(paligamists for example).
 
markkus757 said:
Kelly is welcoming someone else to do his work for him. Once somebody makes one change to it, it will become difficult for the government to say no to any other changes, let alone a complete abolishment. This is kind of the same mindset that gay marriage has. Once you allow one exception, you have allow the rest(paligamists for example).
[post="200163"][/post]​

Don't bet on it. D'ja ever go into a voting booth only to find the ballot is written in English and Spanish only. What I'm saying is why do they discriminate against Italian, Dutch, Farsi, German, Urdo speakers. Are they not US citizens also. I could not get one in my native language. All they had was English and Spanish. :down:
Personally I think there should be one mandatory language, and only one. That being English for all official documents. :up:
 
markkus757 said:
Kelly is welcoming someone else to do his work for him. Once somebody makes one change to it, it will become difficult for the government to say no to any other changes, let alone a complete abolishment. This is kind of the same mindset that gay marriage has. Once you allow one exception, you have allow the rest(paligamists for example).
[post="200163"][/post]​

I truly hope that you are being facetious.

But I couldn't agree more...why have economic freedom and free competition in a capitalist society? And why grant rights to sub-human people?

Yes...I AM being facetious. Once you deny rights to one, you allow the rest (resegregation).
 
Personally, I think the time has come to abolish Wright. It protects WN as much as it protects AMR.

Then again, I'd also like to see perimeter rules abolished at the two other airports which have them -- LGA and DCA. Those rules were set up to encourage growth at JFK and IAD respectively. Last I checked, JFK and IAD were doing quite well on their own.
 
Because AA seems to be the "favorite son" in Texas, as far as the TX politico's go, I think "Wright" is safe.
Ol' Prune face(Kay Baily Hutch) etc, knows beyond any doubt, which TX airline put's the "most butter on the Texas toast"

NH/BB's

ps,
Think KBH has ever tried BOTOX ?????????/
Mabey she overdosed on it.
 
KBH may be a prune-face and she may be Republican, but at least she is intelligent.

NHBB have pity on those of us in Texas. Our OTHER senator, John Cornyn, is referred to inside the Beltway as THE DUMBEST MAN IN WASHINGTON D.C. Not only does he not know anything, he doesn't even suspect.
 
Artificial barriers to true competition hurt the Legacy Carriers.

AA spent the last thirty years ignoring LUV, they grew in appreciation of that ignorance.

True: LUV operates domestic only. Show me a Legacy carrier that has no domestic feed for thier International Operations and I'll show you a DEAD Legacy Carrier.
 
Don't understand how this is good news for AA. It would be much better for AA to have WN in DFW that a Jetblue or expanded Airtran which both offer a product similar to AAs. With WN there is a distinct difference espescially with their cattle car boarding process.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top