Jump to content

ebwgs

ebwgs

Member Since 23 Aug 2004
Offline Last Active Yesterday, 07:50 PM
-----

In Topic: If AA and US Airways do merge, what will happen to JFK and Philadelphia

22 May 2012 - 12:04 AM

View PostFWAAA, on 21 May 2012 - 09:13 PM, said:

I predict that both hubs will be abandoned. US-AA will build a great big new super hub at Trenton.

I had to laugh at this! Y'all need to stop treating this child so badly!

In Topic: US-AA Merger Articles (Merged Topics)

03 May 2012 - 03:16 PM

This is a great thread.

In Topic: Merger Relief for American Airlines: April 24, 2012

02 May 2012 - 11:01 PM

View Postwings396, on 02 May 2012 - 08:18 PM, said:

I still have no interest in you, and have always found your Pro-Delta stuff to be a bit overboard as well as annoying. You chimed in on many US posts long before the AA topic came about. You are now going over the top in trying to convince whoever you can that AA is better off without US, even though credible sources are saying otherwise. Are you in touch with any of the creditors on the UCC to know where they stand on the merger?  I have seen many of your page long Delta love letters posed on their boards, and have often wondered how/why anyone to be so Pro-company while claiming not to work for them. I think that you have also bashed SWA & AT prior to becoming consumed with the AA/US topic. I have been on these boards for nearly 10 years, and have NEVER seen anyone so vocal about any airline such as you are. If it has any possible effect on Delta, you are on it like a fly on a fresh turd. If you honestly have no ties to Delta in any way shape or form, you should seek mental help. You must have some hidden motivating factor that drives you to spend a good portion of your life typing all of this rhetoric about the airlines.

Are you even in the Airline Industry?
Did you previously work for Delta?
Do you want to work for Delta?
Are you working with one of Delta's PR firms?
Are you a lobbyist for Delta?
Are you really Richard Anderson, or a bootlicker of his?
Are you one of AA's Creditors?
Are your working for Horton?
Are you just some poor lonely guy who has nothing else to do, except post here?
Are you just dong this because you saw Delta L-1011's when you were a kid?
Are you a college student working a degree in airline management?
If you can't answer YES to any of these questions, pick up the phone NOW, and call for help.
If you hurry, perhaps you can land a managers job at that new Delta refinery outside of Philly.....

Like

In Topic: Who wants a merger with AA?

27 April 2012 - 02:34 PM

View PostBonTemps, on 27 April 2012 - 01:56 PM, said:

No commuting employee should be given preference over another employee on active status, it is an employee's choice weather or not they live where they work like most other employees have to do. It's not my problem if you want to live in Birmingham and work in LAX/ORD/DFW/CLT/PHL. I'll be darned if the last seat goes to a "commuter" and I have a wedding or other family event or paid for vacation to go to.  Funny how only pilots and flight attendants feel this way...

The commuter is going to work to help keep a company running so that you can have a wedding to go to.

In Topic: Who wants a merger with AA?

27 April 2012 - 02:29 PM

View Postnycbusdriver, on 24 April 2012 - 01:06 PM, said:

It's nice to hear that AA gives retirees the same priority as employees, all based on date of hire. As an aspiring retiree, I think that's the fair way to do it. The only time a pass riding employee should be given priority is if he/she is commuting to work. Not from work. There should be a specific category to cover employees going to work ahead of employees/retirees doing liesure travel.

Active employees should always have boarding priority over retired employees. While the retiree's work in building the company is appreciated, the active employee's work in maintaining and further building the company should prevail commuting or not. Always.