Javascript Disabled Detected

You currently have javascript disabled. Several functions may not work. Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality.

LD3

LD3's Photo

LD3

Member Since 16 Oct 2003
Offline Last Active Today, 06:35 PM

Find content

Community Stats

Group Registered Member
Active Posts 973
Profile Views 6,792
Member Title Veteran
Age Age Unknown
Birthday Birthday Unknown
Gender
Not Telling
Location
CLT

Contact Information

Website URL http://

132 Excellent

Friends

Latest Visitors

AA89
17 Apr 2012 - 15:02
usa1
22 Dec 2011 - 09:01
mrbreeze
22 Aug 2011 - 21:49
redheadtempe33
10 Jun 2011 - 19:53
BoeingBoy
06 Apr 2011 - 23:04

In Topic: If AA and US Airways do merge, what will happen to JFK and Philadelphia

Today, 05:04 AM

Maybe he is the next up and coming Kinglobjaw...

In Topic: FAA proposes $395,850 civil penalty against US Airways

Yesterday, 06:05 PM

700UW, on 22 May 2012 - 05:31 PM, said:

Plus the major thing is everything is presented packaged all ready so you really dont know whats in the box.

That's what struck me when it was stated as undeclared, was it presented on the waybill as a non haz commodity? If it was and the consignor is a known shipper, then the freight agent would have no reason to queston it...It may be something as idiotic that the original shipper did not want to pay a haz mat fee..

In Topic: FAA proposes $395,850 civil penalty against US Airways

Yesterday, 05:07 PM

Thats the problem with contracting out your cargo handling, you have no control over the training the contractor gets. Back in the 80's & early 90's when our freighter ops were strong we were IATA certified and had our recurrent every year...When the company started pulling back the freighters we went out and picked up the CO & NW cargo contracts, never once did we have to show we were haz certified or even provide training.