Jump to content

AMFA VS AMP


  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

#1
rifbound

rifbound

    Member

  • Registered Member
  • PipPip
  • 58 posts
What would be the real difference between getting AMFA vs AMP in here now? AMFA has been around and has the funds and experience and AMP has what to offer as far as that goes?
Don't get me wrong, anyone but the TWSCREW will do pretty much, but explain to me why we droppped off the AMFA bandwagon and went to AMP? Is it beecause it's something that the AA /AMT guy's started? Just wondering.

#2
Rogallo

Rogallo

    Senior

  • Registered Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 396 posts
Here we go again.... :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
Beware the lollipop of mediocrity. Lick once and you suck forever.

#3
Tex-Mech

Tex-Mech

    Senior

  • Registered Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 411 posts

View Postrifbound, on 18 February 2012 - 08:10 AM, said:

What would be the real difference between getting AMFA vs AMP in here now? AMFA has been around and has the funds and experience and AMP has what to offer as far as that goes?
Don't get me wrong, anyone but the TWSCREW will do pretty much, but explain to me why we droppped off the AMFA bandwagon and went to AMP? Is it beecause it's something that the AA /AMT guy's started? Just wondering.
From what I saw, AMFA became a dead issue because of the loss of jobs, pension, retiree medical, outsourcing, more flexible work rules, paycuts, loss of sick time, loss of some holidays, etc. that were existing shortly before they were certified at UAL, or through the bankruptcy process at UAL when they were the union. In addition, their refusal to give up 50% of the jobs at NWA led to the strike and more fear at AA. Remeber, all that was wrong in the world became AMFA's fault.

Compared that to the present fiasco, where we are taking more than 50% job loss since 2003, including the soon to be lost jobs, and the loss of pension, retiree medical, outsourcing, more flexible work rules, paycuts, loss of sick time, loss of some holidays, etc. Now we are second to last and soon to be last in compensation packages with all the equivalent cuts suffered elsewhere, but at least fleet service remained in the high end of their wage comparisons. :blink:

I cannot answer your question. ;)
Turning out the lights on the Rock

#4
TWU informer

TWU informer

    Veteran

  • Registered Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,102 posts

Quote

Remember, all that was wrong in the world became AMFA's fault

THEN AND NOW!

Remember, all that was wrong in the world became TULSA's fault

Sounds like a broken record skipping over and over and over
TWU Members Should File a Class Action DFR against James C Little

#5
rifbound

rifbound

    Member

  • Registered Member
  • PipPip
  • 58 posts

View PostTWU informer, on 18 February 2012 - 11:03 AM, said:

THEN AND NOW!

Remember, all that was wrong in the world became TULSA's fault

Sounds like a broken record skipping over and over and over
lol, was just wondering. well then after reading more on the amp website it's looking more like hey way to go. lets see what happens,maybe we can get another one in here.

#6
Buck

Buck

    Veteran

  • Contributor
  • 4,223 posts
Now all that would be needed, would be a 2/3 majority comparable to the last T/A and maybe the law, the company and the TWU would see that what what the mechanics want is best for the company.
"VOTE NO!"

#7
enough already

enough already

    Senior

  • Registered Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 366 posts

View PostRogallo, on 18 February 2012 - 09:36 AM, said:

Here we go again.... :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
Yeah, a tired subject of which niether will ever represent AA. The membership doesn't have the stones for it.

#8
787nightmare

787nightmare

    Veteran

  • Registered Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 558 posts
As far as I'm concerned, my God, it can't get any worse.
I mean really....




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users