96 replies to this topic

[ograc]

necigrad, on 28 February 2012 - 06:50 PM, said:

Actually, the question is "Will the candidates make themselves and/or their qualifications and beliefs available to the membership." The membership can't be responsible unless the candidates show why they are the best candidates. Seeing a brief summary of each person is nice, but useless. Each candidate should be able to provide at least 150-250 words on why they are right for the job. Also, note that I'm only saying why they're right, not why an opponent is wrong. Those childish games should be left to the Federally elected politicians, who (I hope like hell) are less mature then those who may be running for DL positions.

Duly noted. There will be candidates who ask for support because they feel they can and want an opportunity to do a better job representing the membership. Likewise, there will be candidates who choose to second guess and bash other candidates, as a means to gain support. The members need to consider this issue carefully in June before deciding who gets their support.
ograc