Jump to content

New Airline-Old Name, People Express


  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic

#1
SparrowHawk

SparrowHawk

    Veteran

  • Registered Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,529 posts

Quote

Low-cost airline with familiar name hopes to fly

Monday - 2/13/2012, 7:32pm ET

By BROCK VERGAKIS and SAMANTHA BOMKAMP
Associated Press

NORFOLK, Va. - The name PeoplExpress conjures up thoughts of cheap fares, packed planes and bare-bones service.

If regulators agree, the name will be back this summer, attached to an airline that hopes to borrow from the old playbook while avoiding some of the mistakes that doomed one of the pioneers of the no frills airline business.

PeoplExpress Airlines announced Monday that it will be headquartered at Newport News-Williamsburg International Airport in southeastern Virginia. The airline plans to offer flights on the East Coast this summer. But a successful launch is far from a sure thing. It still needs approval from the U.S. government. And it still needs to secure financing.

Entire Article

Kind of an interesting business model so far as I read. Long shot if you ask me. Thoughts?
Truth Is Treason In The Empire of Lies

#2
ChockJockey

ChockJockey

    Veteran

  • Registered Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 667 posts

View PostSparrowHawk, on 14 February 2012 - 02:47 PM, said:

Entire Article

Kind of an interesting business model so far as I read. Long shot if you ask me. Thoughts?
I wish they'd hurry up and get that airline going so we can merge with them.

#3
etops1

etops1

    Veteran

  • Registered Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,567 posts

View PostChockJockey, on 14 February 2012 - 02:53 PM, said:

I wish they'd hurry up and get that airline going so we can merge with them.
lol!!

#4
LD3

LD3

    Veteran

  • Registered Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 972 posts

View PostSparrowHawk, on 14 February 2012 - 02:47 PM, said:

Entire Article

Thoughts?

Yeh, move to the SW forum since they are such an influence.....

#5
john john

john john

    Veteran

  • Contributor
  • 4,612 posts

View PostSparrowHawk, on 14 February 2012 - 02:47 PM, said:

Entire Article

Kind of an interesting business model so far as I read. Long shot if you ask me. Thoughts?
History of America West airlines


http://www.psa-histo...wa/history.html
A combination of ideas were used in the formation of America West. Cross-utilization of employees, brought to new extremes by PEOPLExpress, would be a major feature of America West. Pilots would also work dispatch, while Customer Service Representatives (CSR) would work as flight attendants, ramp agents, gate agents, ticket agents, or reservation agents - depending on the day.
Another feature of America West, borrowed from PEOPLExpress and PSA, was on-board ticketing. Passengers could buy tickets before their flight, or onboard. Gate desks were replaced with a large, circular counter, called the "Seat Assignment Center" - but quickly nicknamed the Queen Mary. While on-board ticketing was a good idea at the time, it led to more problems - such as breaking change, or balancing out the tickets. On-board ticketing survived a year, before being replaced with a traditional ticketing

#6
BoeingBoy

BoeingBoy

    Veteran

  • Registered Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,041 posts

View PostSparrowHawk, on 14 February 2012 - 02:47 PM, said:

Kind of an interesting business model so far as I read. Long shot if you ask me. Thoughts?

While much is being made of the name, to me it depends on whether management is smart enough to carve out a niche and stay in it. The original PE tried to break out if it's niche and the result is obvious. Of more recent start-ups, FL (thanks to buying and taking the name of Airtran) did ok with a mostly network model while Allegient has done very well with it's older planes, point to point model. And both have lasted a lot longer than the original PE.

Jim
Silver: No question the [9th] embraced the issue that there was harm to the West Pilots.

#7
SparrowHawk

SparrowHawk

    Veteran

  • Registered Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,529 posts

View PostBoeingBoy, on 14 February 2012 - 05:35 PM, said:

While much is being made of the name, to me it depends on whether management is smart enough to carve out a niche and stay in it. The original PE tried to break out if it's niche and the result is obvious. Of more recent start-ups, FL (thanks to buying and taking the name of Airtran) did ok with a mostly network model while Allegient has done very well with it's older planes, point to point model. And both have lasted a lot longer than the original PE.

Jim

It's a tried and true approach to go where the competition isn't. Whether you're in the airline or Schmatta (rag Trade) or any business if you can fill a specific niche you can prosper. The one thing I found confusing is the use of B-737-400's. Seems a bit large for small city markets? Maybe it's because there are about eight bajillion of them on the used market and the price is right??

So for the sake of discussion let's say this airline gets going, how does this effect US?
Truth Is Treason In The Empire of Lies

#8
BoeingBoy

BoeingBoy

    Veteran

  • Registered Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,041 posts

View PostSparrowHawk, on 14 February 2012 - 06:04 PM, said:

The one thing I found confusing is the use of B-737-400's. Seems a bit large for small city markets?
They are relatively inexpensive. But Allegient uses MD80's which are about the same capacity and look at a lot of the cities they serve. A lot of it is picking when to serve the smaller cities - they may not support high frequency daily service but have enough traffic for several days a week with 1-2 flights/day. When you're only paying $200 per day in lease costs you can afford to let the plane sit more than when you're paying $2000 and up per day for a new plane.

Jim
Silver: No question the [9th] embraced the issue that there was harm to the West Pilots.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users