I was looking at the booking section and it has listed PHL-SFO with 6 N/S, 1 being CO op westbound. Seems wild that UA would add all those flights just due to Virgin America doing 2. US has 5/Day also. Just seems like there is going to be a war this summer. LAX flight is a AM departure too in APR.
#1
Posted 29 January 2012 - 09:38 AM
#2
Posted 29 January 2012 - 09:45 AM
Is there a chance that the UA/CO flights are "operated by US Airways"? They all do codeshare a lot.
If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not your sport.
#3
Posted 29 January 2012 - 10:21 AM
jimntx, on 29 January 2012 - 09:45 AM, said:
Is there a chance that the UA/CO flights are "operated by US Airways"? They all do codeshare a lot.
#4
Posted 31 January 2012 - 02:10 PM
OAG Schedule for 7/20/2012 (Peak Season to the West Coast) :
PHL-SFO
UA 4 Non Stops and 1 One Stop
US 5 Non Stops
VX 2 Non Stops
UA has 2 PHL Departing flights scheduled with 10 minutes of VX's.
9 against 2 - That's a bit of a lopsided challenge. Seems that US would care less about VX at PHL if they are planning to merge with AA and switch to OW. Kind of a shame that U.S. airlines will do anything to destroy VX and deprive the consumer the benefit of choosing a higher quality product. IMO, the really difficult challenge for VX is to convince high yield passengers to leave Alliance members and choose VX - which cannot offer any international FF travel benefits - not even on other Virgin affiliates (e.g., Virgin Atlantic). I'm afraid that unless US does actually merge out of *A, VX's days on this route may be numbered.
PHL-SFO
UA 4 Non Stops and 1 One Stop
US 5 Non Stops
VX 2 Non Stops
UA has 2 PHL Departing flights scheduled with 10 minutes of VX's.
9 against 2 - That's a bit of a lopsided challenge. Seems that US would care less about VX at PHL if they are planning to merge with AA and switch to OW. Kind of a shame that U.S. airlines will do anything to destroy VX and deprive the consumer the benefit of choosing a higher quality product. IMO, the really difficult challenge for VX is to convince high yield passengers to leave Alliance members and choose VX - which cannot offer any international FF travel benefits - not even on other Virgin affiliates (e.g., Virgin Atlantic). I'm afraid that unless US does actually merge out of *A, VX's days on this route may be numbered.
#5
Posted 31 January 2012 - 10:23 PM
12 Nonstops in May
US-5
UA-4
VX-2
CO-1
I included CO with UA in the title, but UA had a 11:45am nonstop that got pulled off. It may have been on for a short time. Also the CO and UA flights 2 of them leave within 50 minutes of each other with US's flight in the middle. With VX flying 3 to LAX, I wonder what DL's response will be. US has 6 on the LAX flight.
US-5
UA-4
VX-2
CO-1
I included CO with UA in the title, but UA had a 11:45am nonstop that got pulled off. It may have been on for a short time. Also the CO and UA flights 2 of them leave within 50 minutes of each other with US's flight in the middle. With VX flying 3 to LAX, I wonder what DL's response will be. US has 6 on the LAX flight.
#6
Posted 02 February 2012 - 09:52 AM
With VX decision to enter the market, UA has no choice but to add service in order to protect its key hub
Celebrating the best in commercial aviation.
#7
Posted 02 February 2012 - 01:39 PM
BuffaloJoe, on 31 January 2012 - 10:23 PM, said:
12 Nonstops in May
US-5
UA-4
VX-2
CO-1
I included CO with UA in the title, but UA had a 11:45am nonstop that got pulled off. It may have been on for a short time. Also the CO and UA flights 2 of them leave within 50 minutes of each other with US's flight in the middle. With VX flying 3 to LAX, I wonder what DL's response will be. US has 6 on the LAX flight.
US-5
UA-4
VX-2
CO-1
I included CO with UA in the title, but UA had a 11:45am nonstop that got pulled off. It may have been on for a short time. Also the CO and UA flights 2 of them leave within 50 minutes of each other with US's flight in the middle. With VX flying 3 to LAX, I wonder what DL's response will be. US has 6 on the LAX flight.
At some point, someone is going to have to answer the question...Does the PHL-SFO market justify 12 non-stop transcons/day? As important as SFO has been to AA over the years, we have been cutting back in the SFO market in general.
If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not your sport.
#8
Posted 02 February 2012 - 03:33 PM
To/from SFO by itself? Probably not an a year around basis, at least not with average load factors high enough to be profitable. The bay area? Yes, if passengers can be attracted to SFO because of the competition (i.e. lower fares which hurts US/UA more than VX).
Jim
Jim
Silver: No question the [9th] embraced the issue that there was harm to the West Pilots.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users



Sign In
Create Account


Back to top











