BoeingBoy, on 20 January 2012 - 05:31 PM, said:
I'm a little concerned that this might be the end result of computer design. Designers and engineers can now design airplanes with very little margin over that required for certification. Gone are the days of making the planes stronger if there was any doubt. There's a story about the DC-3, which had the wings bolted together outboard of the engines using a couple of hundred bolts on each side. Supposedly there were worries among some potential customers about the strength of using bolts instead of a continuous wing spar so Donald Douglass had mechanics remove all but 3 of the bolts and flew the airplane through a set of maneuvers, erasing all doubt about the strength of the wing. Nowadays, if the computer said the dc3 needed 2.985 bolts to be strong enough, only 3 would be used instead of the hundreds Douglas put in.
Jim
Jim
IIRC, critical flight components (engine, hydraulics, etc...) used to have a design failure rate (FEMA Analysis) of 1:to the -10th mantissa. Overbuilt but the technology created many robust fail safe systems.
After the UA BK and maintenance programs were reduced through 'proof' of no failures, my confidence has waned somewhat as maintenance programs were lengthened.
(PS, I worked on C47's (DC3) sometimes and almost needed a climbing rope to reach the cockpit...
Then I find this: It's never been safer to fly; deaths at record low
Sign In »
Register Now!
Help





Back to top
MultiQuote










