http://online.wsj.co...=googlenews_wsj
Republic Airways Holdings Inc. on Tuesday announced plans to dispose of its loss-making Frontier Airlines business, sparking a rally in the stock of what some analysts had once viewed as the industry's next candidate for bankruptcy protection.
#1
Posted 08 November 2011 - 05:41 PM
"I am serious. And don't call me Shirley" Leslie Nielsen as Dr Rumack in Airplane. Paramount 1980
#2
Posted 08 November 2011 - 06:13 PM
Not to belittle you - that was in the headlines today - but Republic started talking about this 2-3 months ago and it's actually contractual. In the last "realignment" agreement with the pilots (and possibly other groups) Republic is required to become a minority holder of Frontier by 2014.
Jim
Jim
Silver: No question the [9th] embraced the issue that there was harm to the West Pilots.
#3
Posted 08 November 2011 - 10:56 PM
Republic Surges Most Since 2009 With Frontier Airlines Set for Separation
Steps under study in a second round of restructuring at Frontier include selling flight slots at DCA that Bedford said today were valued at $80 million, and 10 E190s.
Click here to read the story.
Steps under study in a second round of restructuring at Frontier include selling flight slots at DCA that Bedford said today were valued at $80 million, and 10 E190s.
Click here to read the story.
#4
Posted 08 November 2011 - 11:13 PM
Selling assets is NEVER a positive sign.
Does anyone know if the 319/320's at Frontier are powered similarly to US?
Still think Dougie should dust off his rolodex and get the money lined up to buy Frontier out of BK because IMO that's where they are headed and IMO it will be sooner rather then later.
Does anyone know if the 319/320's at Frontier are powered similarly to US?
Still think Dougie should dust off his rolodex and get the money lined up to buy Frontier out of BK because IMO that's where they are headed and IMO it will be sooner rather then later.
Truth Is Treason In The Empire of Lies
#5
Posted 08 November 2011 - 11:23 PM
#6
Posted 08 November 2011 - 11:40 PM
SparrowHawk, on 08 November 2011 - 11:13 PM, said:
Selling assets is NEVER a positive sign.
Does anyone know if the 319/320's at Frontier are powered similarly to US?
Still think Dougie should dust off his rolodex and get the money lined up to buy Frontier out of BK because IMO that's where they are headed and IMO it will be sooner rather then later.
Does anyone know if the 319/320's at Frontier are powered similarly to US?
Still think Dougie should dust off his rolodex and get the money lined up to buy Frontier out of BK because IMO that's where they are headed and IMO it will be sooner rather then later.
It would be smart to buy DCA slots and perhaps 190's for a cheap price.
Cheers
#7
Posted 08 November 2011 - 11:51 PM
SparrowHawk, on 08 November 2011 - 11:13 PM, said:
Selling assets is NEVER a positive sign.
While you're right, right now RAH is only studying selling DCA slots and 10 E-190's. All they've definitely done is return 2 E-190's to the leasor while taking delivery of 2 from Embraer, and deferred delivery on 4 more - keeping the E190 fleet basically constant. They've also signed agreements with Airbus for 80 A320neo's but I haven't seen a breakdown of firm orders, orders subject to confirmation, or options. It seems only natural, if RAH is going to completely spin off F9, to not get a bunch more E-190's when he might not have a place to fly them a few years from now.
Despite Bedford's spin that Frontier has been put on sound footing and it being time to let it go, I do think he discovered that F9 was too much to swallow. Running a "real" airline where you have all the risk is far different from running a RJ fee for departure operation where almost all the decisions and risk belong to the contracting partner. I remain convinced that that was Siegel's downfall - he came to US from running Eagle where he mostly did what AA said since AA paid the bills and took the risks. He just wasn't prepared for actually having to run an airline with all the decisions and risk that that entails. So he did what he knew - get/contract a bunch of RJ's for US.
Jim
Silver: No question the [9th] embraced the issue that there was harm to the West Pilots.
#8
Posted 09 November 2011 - 01:47 AM
BoeingBoy, on 08 November 2011 - 11:51 PM, said:
...Running a "real" airline where you have all the risk is far different from running a RJ fee for departure operation where almost all the decisions and risk belong to the contracting partner. I remain convinced that that was Siegel's downfall - he came to US from running Eagle where he mostly did what AA said since AA paid the bills and took the risks. He just wasn't prepared for actually having to run an airline with all the decisions and risk that that entails. So he did what he knew - get/contract a bunch of RJ's for US.
Jim
Great post, Jim!! There is a world of difference indeed.
"I am serious. And don't call me Shirley" Leslie Nielsen as Dr Rumack in Airplane. Paramount 1980
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users



Sign In
Create Account


Back to top











