NYGiantsFan90, on 03 September 2010 - 12:41 AM, said:
Lets see there is a difference from a few months ago as you posted versus several years ago as you posted again, so which is it?
Your article is from 2009, which says several years ago, they took concessions in 2005, thats five years ago, not several months.
They voted a union in this year, not several years ago, they took concessions five years ago.
They voted in a union this year because of the merger, not concessions taken five years ago.
Your article is from 2009, which says several years ago, they took concessions in 2005, thats five years ago, not several months.
They voted a union in this year, not several years ago, they took concessions five years ago.
They voted in a union this year because of the merger, not concessions taken five years ago.
NYGiantsFan,
Do you think organizing an election to have an union happens overnight? You think a disgruntled ramper wakes-up one morning after seeing the cut in his paycheck and says, "You know, I'm pissed and I am going to force the company to have an election next month so we can have an union?"
These elections take YEARS because they require finding organizers within the rank and file, getting signatures, having Federal labor agencies review the case, and then the company delays, stalls and attempts many legal moves to disqualify the application. You think I am wrong in my analysis because after the CAL paycuts there was not an election shortly afterwards? You said it best in a prior post... "guess you dont know what happens."
So Corrects (Again) Jester.



Sign In
Create Account
This topic is locked

Back to top











