808 replies to this topic

[SparrowHawk]

Veritas, on 03 February 2012 - 03:35 PM, said:

Yes, that is exactly what I am saying.

I missed that part. My Bad. I just wish this would go away. It detracts from the debate. It's like an old pet. His hair is falling out, teeth missing, stinks to high heaven, poops on the rug and still refuses to go gracefully. This has been around for so long now I'm beginning to wonder if it has merit.

[delldude]

SparrowHawk, on 03 February 2012 - 03:41 PM, said:

I missed that part. My Bad. I just wish this would go away. It detracts from the debate. It's like an old pet. His hair is falling out, teeth missing, stinks to high heaven, poops on the rug and still refuses to go gracefully. This has been around for so long now I'm beginning to wonder if it has merit.

All started with the Hillary campaign....LOL

So its your fault DNC.

And Tree, its not going to break my heart by any means but you will be cleaning out your pants when the definition comes to be not me....LOL

Hey, I'm all for getting a case before SCOTUS and get a decision one way or the other. Like it isn't going to be an issue down the road.

Judge signs

“For the purposes of this analysis, this court considered that President Barack Obama was born in the United States.

Don't get too high.....

Quote

Remember the Indiana State case where the Court of Appeal ruled not only that Ankeny lacked standing etc etc but also defined the meaning of Natural Born, citing Wong Kim Ark? Well, the case appears to be readying itself for appeal to the Indiana Supreme Court who may decide to allow transfer, which is similar to granting cert at the Federal level.

If the case makes it to the IN Supreme Court, the Court will likely focus on the dismissal which was based on Constitutional grounds and not on the obiter dicta of ‘natural born’. So it is unlikely that the IN Supreme Court or for that matter, the US Supreme Court will touch the Natural Born definition anytime soon. If they do so, the IN Appeals Court has provided an excellent foundation of the legal precedents. Let’s keep our eyes open for any developments here.

2/11/10 APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR TRANSFER (9) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (9) BY MAIL DATE 02/11/10 JS 02/15/10

[tech2101]

SparrowHawk, on 03 February 2012 - 01:38 PM, said:

[b]Obama Will Not Be On The Ballot In Georgia. Go, Georgia!


Here it is. The Georgia judge has ruled that Obama is not eligible to appear on the GA ballot. Read it ....

Funny how that did not make "breaking news"

Ron Paul, Ron Paul, Ron Paul.

[SparrowHawk]

tech2101, on 03 February 2012 - 10:06 PM, said:

Funny how that did not make "breaking news"

Ron Paul, Ron Paul, Ron Paul.

To learn more and support Ron Paul go to his campaign website or just type in his name on You Tube and you can learn an awful lot. Thanks for your support.

[delldude]

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Quote

CONCERNED CITIZENS OF PA, RESIDENTS OF AND DULY REGISTERED MEMBERS OF THE ELECTORATE, WILL HOLD A PRESS CONFERENCE 3:00PM, FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 17TH, AT THE CAPITOL ROTUNDA IN HARRISBURG, PA, TO ANNOUNCE THAT A STATE LAWSUIT, IN COMMONWEALTH COURT, WILL BE FILED ON FRIDAY, SEEKING A JUDGEMENT TO HAVE CANDIDATE BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA’S NOMINATION PETITION OR PAPERS SET ASIDE DUE TO HIS FAILURE TO MEET THE NATURAL BORN CITIZEN CONSTITUTIONAL ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE HE SEEKS.

My link

[AA89]

delldude, on 17 February 2012 - 08:01 AM, said:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE





My link

Isn't it great to live in a country where anyone can sue or file an injunction against anyone? No matter how frivolous. I wonder if the folks that are so concerned about President Obama's birth certificate are just as concerned about every other candidate that has ever run for that office in our lifetime. This includes Mitt Romney and his family's ties to Mexico and the Morman church with all of the baggage that comes with that.
Can we move on to real issues?

[delldude]

AA89, on 17 February 2012 - 09:33 AM, said:

Isn't it great to live in a country where anyone can sue or file an injunction against anyone? No matter how frivolous. I wonder if the folks that are so concerned about President Obama's birth certificate are just as concerned about every other candidate that has ever run for that office in our lifetime. This includes Mitt Romney and his family's ties to Mexico and the Morman church with all of the baggage that comes with that.
Can we move on to real issues?

Mitt's a natural born citizen.....what's his voodoo religion have to do with anything?

[Ms Tree]

AA89, on 17 February 2012 - 09:33 AM, said:

Isn't it great to live in a country where anyone can sue or file an injunction against anyone? No matter how frivolous. I wonder if the folks that are so concerned about President Obama's birth certificate are just as concerned about every other candidate that has ever run for that office in our lifetime. This includes Mitt Romney and his family's ties to Mexico and the Morman church with all of the baggage that comes with that.
Can we move on to real issues?

The really interesting part will come when/if Marc Rubio ever runs on the WH ticket. He was born in 1971 but his parents were not naturalized till 1975. The back stroke the birthers will do would qualify for a Olympic event. The RNC whack jobs are the gift that keeps giving.