.
#161
Posted 25 January 2012 - 08:23 PM
Leaders find solutions, not excuses.
#162
Posted 26 January 2012 - 12:51 PM
A woman brought a very limp duck into a veterinary surgeon. As she laid her pet on the table, the vet pulled out his
stethoscope and listened to the bird's chest. After a moment or two, the vet shook his head and sadly said, "I'm
sorry, your duck, Cuddles, has passed away."The distressed woman wailed, "Are you sure?""Yes, I am sure. Your
duck is dead," replied the vet.."How can you be so sure?" she protested. "I mean you haven't done any testing on him
or anything. He might just be in a coma or something."The vet turned around and left the room. He returned a few minutes
later with a black Labrador Retriever. As the duck's owner looked on in amazement,the dog stood on his hind legs, put his
front paws on the examination table and sniffed the duck from top to bottom. He then looked up at the vet with sad eyes and
shook his head.The vet patted the dog on the head and took it out of the room. A few minutes later he returned with a cat. The
cat jumped on the table and also delicately sniffed the duck from head to foot. The cat sat back on its haunches, shook its head,
meowed softly and strolled out of the room.The vet looked at the woman and said, "I'm sor ry, but as I said, this is most definitely,
100% certifiably, a dead duck. "The vet turned to his computer terminal, hit a few keys and produced a bill, which he handed to the
woman..she cried, "$1500 just to tell me my duck is dead!"The vet shrugged, "I'm sorry. If you had just taken my word for it, the
bill would have been $20, but with the Lab Report and the Cat Scan, it's now $1500.
stethoscope and listened to the bird's chest. After a moment or two, the vet shook his head and sadly said, "I'm
sorry, your duck, Cuddles, has passed away."The distressed woman wailed, "Are you sure?""Yes, I am sure. Your
duck is dead," replied the vet.."How can you be so sure?" she protested. "I mean you haven't done any testing on him
or anything. He might just be in a coma or something."The vet turned around and left the room. He returned a few minutes
later with a black Labrador Retriever. As the duck's owner looked on in amazement,the dog stood on his hind legs, put his
front paws on the examination table and sniffed the duck from top to bottom. He then looked up at the vet with sad eyes and
shook his head.The vet patted the dog on the head and took it out of the room. A few minutes later he returned with a cat. The
cat jumped on the table and also delicately sniffed the duck from head to foot. The cat sat back on its haunches, shook its head,
meowed softly and strolled out of the room.The vet looked at the woman and said, "I'm sor ry, but as I said, this is most definitely,
100% certifiably, a dead duck. "The vet turned to his computer terminal, hit a few keys and produced a bill, which he handed to the
woman..she cried, "$1500 just to tell me my duck is dead!"The vet shrugged, "I'm sorry. If you had just taken my word for it, the
bill would have been $20, but with the Lab Report and the Cat Scan, it's now $1500.
#163
Posted 30 January 2012 - 01:37 PM
#164
Posted 03 February 2012 - 06:01 PM
Got this from a friend...
TSA Watch: “Secret” memo explains differences between medical devices and weapons of mass destruction
January 29, 2012
Remember when the TSA accidentally published its passenger screening manual online a few years ago? Well, in light of this week’s events, which call into question the agency’s basic operating procedures, I’m not waiting around for it to do that again (although it probably will).
In the spirit of helpfulness, I thought I’d write my own memo to the agency’s 58,401 employees, clarifying the functions of some commonly-confused items and how they should be properly screened. Since it’s the TSA, where everything is a secret, this memo would be labeled “Sensitive Security Information” (SSI) and you wouldn’t be able to read it until the agency inadvertently published it online, and then it would be absolutely fine.
But it’s my blog, and I say the public has a right to know.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Transportation Security Administration
Aviation Security Directive
Subject: Security Directive
Number: SD [redacted]
Date: January 29, 2012
This Security Directive (SD) must be implemented immediately. The measures contained in this SD are in addition to all other SDs currently in effect for your operations.
INFORMATION: It has come to our attention that our Transportation Security Officers are easily confused by certain items and passengers during screening. This has put the agency in an unfavorable light, and we are releasing this Security Directive in the hopes of avoiding further embarrassment.
Insulin pumps
An insulin pump is a medical device used for the administration of insulin in the treatment of diabetes. It is not a weapon, even though our screeners in Los Angeles sincerely believed otherwise last week. TSA management is troubled that its advanced imaging technology was not advanced enough to inform its screeners that the passenger was wearing a medical device, and will conduct a through review of the scanners when it’s good and ready, and not a moment sooner.
How to tell the difference between an insulin pump and a weapon: Insulin pumps do not fire bullets, explode, or otherwise pose an immediate threat to aviation security. There are no documented cases of a terrorist attack being perpetrated with an insulin pump.
Cupcakes
A cupcake is a small cake baked in a cup-shaped container and typically iced. The icing has confused many of our agents, who believe the topping may be a terrorist threat. Per previous security directives, TSA policy on cupcakes and other baked goods is clear: These items may be confiscated at any time, for any reason, as long as you share them with your colleagues in the break room. If questioned by the passenger about the basis for taking away their tasty holiday pies and cookies, please refer them to our list of prohibited items.
How to tell the difference between a cupcake and C-4: The cupcake tastes better.
Jewelry
We have noted that many of our agents are confiscating jewelry and clothing that bear the image of weapons, but are, in fact, are not weapons. We are confident that our well-educated and highly-trained workforce can tell the difference between a rhinestone-studded belt buckle shaped like a gun and a real gun. Again, TSAs policy on these confiscations have been clearly outlined in previous Security Directives. Dangerous-looking jewelry may be confiscated and stored in your locker for safe keeping and if your TSA salary is insufficient, it may be sold on eBay. We are sure we know nothing about that. But for heaven’s sake, leave the tacky stuff for the thrift stores. Seriously, we wouldn’t be caught dead in a rhinestone-studded belt buckle of any kind here at TSA headquarters. Have some dignity, people.
How to tell the difference between jewelry and a dangerous weapon: The jewelry is usually on open display and does not require a permit, unless it is being worn by a teen-ager.
Little old ladies
Elderly female passengers are completely harmless, even though they often travel with dangerous-looking assistive devices like canes, walkers, and wheelchairs. They may also have artificial hips and joints that set off the magnetometer, which makes them appear extremely dangerous. TSA is unaware of any terrorist incidents involving this group of travelers, although we applaud our officers for the thorough screening they have given these passengers in the recent past. (Oh, about that letter in which we apologized — our lawyers made us do that.) If you want to pat down an older female passenger, then for goodness sakes pick one that isn’t argumentative, and don’t try it at JFK.
How to tell the difference between a little old lady and a terrorist: Years of experience, my friend. Years of experience.
This memo is a complete work of fiction. But the sentiments expressed in it may be a lot truer than the TSA is willing to admit.
TSA Watch: “Secret” memo explains differences between medical devices and weapons of mass destruction
January 29, 2012
Remember when the TSA accidentally published its passenger screening manual online a few years ago? Well, in light of this week’s events, which call into question the agency’s basic operating procedures, I’m not waiting around for it to do that again (although it probably will).
In the spirit of helpfulness, I thought I’d write my own memo to the agency’s 58,401 employees, clarifying the functions of some commonly-confused items and how they should be properly screened. Since it’s the TSA, where everything is a secret, this memo would be labeled “Sensitive Security Information” (SSI) and you wouldn’t be able to read it until the agency inadvertently published it online, and then it would be absolutely fine.
But it’s my blog, and I say the public has a right to know.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Transportation Security Administration
Aviation Security Directive
Subject: Security Directive
Number: SD [redacted]
Date: January 29, 2012
This Security Directive (SD) must be implemented immediately. The measures contained in this SD are in addition to all other SDs currently in effect for your operations.
INFORMATION: It has come to our attention that our Transportation Security Officers are easily confused by certain items and passengers during screening. This has put the agency in an unfavorable light, and we are releasing this Security Directive in the hopes of avoiding further embarrassment.
Insulin pumps
An insulin pump is a medical device used for the administration of insulin in the treatment of diabetes. It is not a weapon, even though our screeners in Los Angeles sincerely believed otherwise last week. TSA management is troubled that its advanced imaging technology was not advanced enough to inform its screeners that the passenger was wearing a medical device, and will conduct a through review of the scanners when it’s good and ready, and not a moment sooner.
How to tell the difference between an insulin pump and a weapon: Insulin pumps do not fire bullets, explode, or otherwise pose an immediate threat to aviation security. There are no documented cases of a terrorist attack being perpetrated with an insulin pump.
Cupcakes
A cupcake is a small cake baked in a cup-shaped container and typically iced. The icing has confused many of our agents, who believe the topping may be a terrorist threat. Per previous security directives, TSA policy on cupcakes and other baked goods is clear: These items may be confiscated at any time, for any reason, as long as you share them with your colleagues in the break room. If questioned by the passenger about the basis for taking away their tasty holiday pies and cookies, please refer them to our list of prohibited items.
How to tell the difference between a cupcake and C-4: The cupcake tastes better.
Jewelry
We have noted that many of our agents are confiscating jewelry and clothing that bear the image of weapons, but are, in fact, are not weapons. We are confident that our well-educated and highly-trained workforce can tell the difference between a rhinestone-studded belt buckle shaped like a gun and a real gun. Again, TSAs policy on these confiscations have been clearly outlined in previous Security Directives. Dangerous-looking jewelry may be confiscated and stored in your locker for safe keeping and if your TSA salary is insufficient, it may be sold on eBay. We are sure we know nothing about that. But for heaven’s sake, leave the tacky stuff for the thrift stores. Seriously, we wouldn’t be caught dead in a rhinestone-studded belt buckle of any kind here at TSA headquarters. Have some dignity, people.
How to tell the difference between jewelry and a dangerous weapon: The jewelry is usually on open display and does not require a permit, unless it is being worn by a teen-ager.
Little old ladies
Elderly female passengers are completely harmless, even though they often travel with dangerous-looking assistive devices like canes, walkers, and wheelchairs. They may also have artificial hips and joints that set off the magnetometer, which makes them appear extremely dangerous. TSA is unaware of any terrorist incidents involving this group of travelers, although we applaud our officers for the thorough screening they have given these passengers in the recent past. (Oh, about that letter in which we apologized — our lawyers made us do that.) If you want to pat down an older female passenger, then for goodness sakes pick one that isn’t argumentative, and don’t try it at JFK.
How to tell the difference between a little old lady and a terrorist: Years of experience, my friend. Years of experience.
This memo is a complete work of fiction. But the sentiments expressed in it may be a lot truer than the TSA is willing to admit.
If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not your sport.
#165
Posted 03 February 2012 - 06:16 PM
#166
Posted 17 February 2012 - 10:01 PM
#167
Posted 18 February 2012 - 07:05 PM
And looks the whole world in the face, For he owes not any man
#168
Posted 24 February 2012 - 06:22 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users



Sign In
Create Account


Back to top













