Jump to content

TWU negotiations.........what?


  • Please log in to reply
6359 replies to this topic

#1
Chuck Schalk

Chuck Schalk

    Senior

  • Registered Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 474 posts
The Presidents Council took the time for negotiating training. Is this suppose to make us feel like they really have a say in contract negotiations? For anyone to think it does, is misinformed! [The TWU International encouraged the concessions of 2003 and now they act like they don't know what we need. The Presidents Council does not need training, they need the TWU International to demand our contract back and lead the membership into battle. But that won't happen, The TWU will hide behind the Presidents Council and blame everything on the Negotiating Committee and the members because they were trained. Even though the Negotiating Committee or the members do not own the contract. Meaning that Jim Little and Gary Yingst have to sign off on the contract not the Negotiating Committee. That is why the negotiating Committee are labeled as only witnesses to the contract( look in your contract book).
The TWU is so entrenched with the company that it is difficult to tell which represents us. This whole project of opening the contract early is a farse. The contract in my opinion has been already discussed and the needs are set awaiting for the games to begin in November. We are mere pawns in this game and the earlier you realize it, the better off you will be to accept your predetermined fate. If the TWU International is just a shadow of the company, then why do we need the TWU International in the Air Transport Division? Anyone can do what the company requests. Remember, the TWU ATD did not support any strikes, bankruptcy, or abrogation of contracts with any real teeth. Talk is just talk! Some were non AFL/CIO and some were AFL/CIO members! To me what is the difference if it will affect us down the road? What is the ATD Purpose if they didn't try to protect our industry!
Negotiations is not what it seems!

#2
NewHampshire Black Bears

NewHampshire Black Bears

    Veteran

  • Registered Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,075 posts
Chuck,

A very good post.
Well thought out, truthful, informative etc, etc !!

But alas, your hard work, will go for "naught"

As you know so well, THE # 1 problem with the TWU/ATD is, NOT AA, not the International, Not even Little/Yingst !

It is(SADLY) the majority of AMT "members" in TUL/DFW/AFW who will ensure, that the twu continues to "INFEST" the AMT group as a whole.

I will depart this earth(some day), NEVER/EVER understanding HOW/WHY the "majority" of these AMT's can continue to "take it in the shorts", and "look in the mirror" with out incuring "projectile VOMMITING" !!!

The male members(of this majority) must surely notice, that when they put there hands in their pockets, that their SCROTUM is MISSING .

I am baffled...TOTALLY baffled !!!!!!!!!!!

NH/BB's
NewHampshireBlackBears

Support our troops in AFGHANISTAN....Bring our troops HOME from IRAQ !!!

#3
ch53D

ch53D

    Senior

  • Registered Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 253 posts

View PostNewHampshire Black Bears, on Jun 5 2007, 02:45 AM, said:

Chuck,

A very good post.
Well thought out, truthful, informative etc, etc !!

But alas, your hard work, will go for "naught"

As you know so well, THE # 1 problem with the TWU/ATD is, NOT AA, not the International, Not even Little/Yingst !

It is(SADLY) the majority of AMT "members" in TUL/DFW/AFW who will ensure, that the twu continues to "INFEST" the AMT group as a whole.

I will depart this earth(some day), NEVER/EVER understanding HOW/WHY the "majority" of these AMT's can continue to "take it in the shorts", and "look in the mirror" with out incuring "projectile VOMMITING" !!!

The male members(of this majority) must surely notice, that when they put there hands in their pockets, that their SCROTUM is MISSING .

I am baffled...TOTALLY baffled !!!!!!!!!!!

NH/BB's

You’re correct about these three stations. Let’s not forget the big picture. Title II is a bigger problem system wide than TUL/DFW/AFW in Title I.


2003 vote results.

Title I: 6250 yes 6173 no = 77

Title II: 1272 yes 459 no = 813

#4
NewHampshire Black Bears

NewHampshire Black Bears

    Veteran

  • Registered Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,075 posts

View Postch53D, on Jun 5 2007, 01:52 PM, said:

You’re correct about these three stations. Let’s not forget the big picture. Title II is a bigger problem system wide than TUL/DFW/AFW in Title I.
2003 vote results.

Title I: 6250 yes 6173 no = 77

Title II: 1272 yes 459 no = 813

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

ch53D,

A good point !

Where are the majority of these title II jobs/stations ?

Also, can you possibly post a station/local.... break down of the title I..2003... YES vote(only) ?

Permit me to add something that I omitted from my earlier post.

I FULLY realize that "everyone's not the same".

For example,
An AMT in BOS/JFK/LGA/EWR/PHL may react in a "milli-second" and tell AA to *UCK OFF, whereas AMT's(in say) ORD/MIA/LAX/SFO may take a little longer to tell AA to *UCK OFF(and thats OK), ...BUT... to CONTINUALLY bend over, and take it in the shorts(without any grease) for AA, in the.."Famous BIG 3 stations" is (to me) BEYOND BELIEF)

And before I forget.........MCI, which group DO YOU fall into ??


ch53D,...Thanx in advance !!

NH/BB's
NewHampshireBlackBears

Support our troops in AFGHANISTAN....Bring our troops HOME from IRAQ !!!

#5
ch53D

ch53D

    Senior

  • Registered Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 253 posts

View PostNewHampshire Black Bears, on Jun 5 2007, 11:22 AM, said:

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

ch53D,

A good point !

Where are the majority of these title II jobs/stations ?

Also, can you possibly post a station/local.... break down of the title I..2003... YES vote(only) ?

Permit me to add something that I omitted from my earlier post.

I FULLY realize that "everyone's not the same".

For example,
An AMT in BOS/JFK/LGA/EWR/PHL may react in a "milli-second" and tell AA to *UCK OFF, whereas AMT's(in say) ORD/MIA/LAX/SFO may take a little longer to tell AA to *UCK OFF(and thats OK), ...BUT... to CONTINUALLY bend over, and take it in the shorts(without any grease) for AA, in the.."Famous BIG 3 stations" is (to me) BEYOND BELIEF)

And before I forget.........MCI, which group DO YOU fall into ??
ch53D,...Thanx in advance !!

NH/BB's
Yes No

510 20 72
514 3998 1869
521 17 16
529 186 333
530 795 290
561 33 375
562 51 828
563 81 440
564 187 559
565 225 580
567 620 773
569 16 14
590 20 24

Title II big station is no other then DFW

#6
Wretched Wrench

Wretched Wrench

    Veteran

  • Registered Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,617 posts
Any time the ATD ventures beyond monosyllabic, they get confused. As in capitulation vis à vis negotiation.
.

#7
Hackman

Hackman

    Veteran

  • Registered Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,031 posts

View Postch53D, on Jun 5 2007, 12:07 PM, said:

Yes No

510 20 72
514 3998 1869
521 17 16
529 186 333
530 795 290
561 33 375
562 51 828
563 81 440
564 187 559
565 225 580
567 620 773
569 16 14
590 20 24

Title II big station is no other then DFW
Jeez I remember now!!!! Look at all the 514 goo-gobblin' yes voters!!!! Still amazed even today.

Why is that not a surprise.

Show us the ShAAred SAAcrifice :blink: :blink: :blink:

#8
Wretched Wrench

Wretched Wrench

    Veteran

  • Registered Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,617 posts

View Postch53D, on Jun 5 2007, 05:07 PM, said:

...........Yes........No

510.... 20....... 72
514.... 3998.. 1869
521.... 17....... 16
529.... 186..... 333
530.... 795.... 290
561.... 33...... 375
562.... 51...... 828
563.... 81...... 440
564.... 187..... 559
565.... 225..... 580
567.... 620..... 773
569.... 16....... 14
590.... 20....... 24


It is worth noting that only the fraidy cats at TUL and MCI sissied out. The line station mechs voted it down. BNA had their roster padded with non-mechanics.
.




3 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users